JANIN, "NATIONAL MUSEUM. NO-ART-ART-STRAJK", 2012
JANIN, "NATIONAL MUSEUM. NO-ART-ART-STRAJK", 2012 ZUZANNA JANIN STUDIO

Oświadczenie Obywatelskiego Forum Sztuki Współczesnej w sprawie "Roku Polski w Rosji" 2015 oraz ośwadczenie w sprawie przeniesienia MANIFESTA'10 planowanego na 2014 w Sankt Petersburgu

REKLAMA
Stanowisko w sprawie roku Polskiego w Rosji w 2015
Zwracamy się do Ministerstwa Spraw Zagranicznych, Ministerstwa Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego, a także do Instytutu Adama Mickiewicza oraz wszystkich innych polskich instytucji zaangażowanych w przygotowywanie planowanego na 2015 rok "Roku Polski w Rosji" i "Roku Rosji w Polsce” do zajęcia jednoznacznego stanowiska wobec aneksji Krymu przez Federacje Rosyjską, który jest uznawany przez międzynarodową społeczność za terytorium Ukrainy.
Wysoko cenimy rosyjską kulturę. Jednak w obecnej, pogarszającej się sytuacji, okupacji Krymu przez wojska rosyjskie i militarnego zagrożenia Ukrainy, kontynuacja organizacji "Roku Polski w Rosji" oraz "Roku Rosji w Polsce" - bez żadnej znaczącej modyfikacji - może być rozumiana, jako zgoda strony polskiej na działania rządu Federacji Rosyjskiej wobec Ukrainy. A tych działań, jako artyści, kuratorzy i krytycy skupieni wokół Obywatelskiego Forum Sztuki Współczesnej, nie akceptujemy.
Mamy konstruktywną propozycję - zamiast "Roku Polski w Rosji" proponujemy organizację "Roku Polski na Ukrainie" oraz "Roku Ukrainy w Polsce". Taka zmiana, byłaby gestem solidarności naszego środowiska i państwa z Ukraińcami, i z wszystkimi ludźmi kultury na Ukrainie, którzy znaleźli się w niezwykle trudnym położeniu – w sytuacji bezpośredniego militarnego zagrożenia i okupacji części terytorium państwa. Byłoby to także finansowe wsparcie dla ukraińskich instytucji i bardzo wyraźny sygnał niezgody na politykę rosyjskiego rządu.
Jeśli nie zareagujemy i będziemy jakby nigdy nic przygotowywać polskie imprezy w Rosji w 2015 roku, to "Rok Polski w Rosji" może być łatwo wykorzystany przez rosyjskie władze do legitymizacji agresywnej polityki prezydenta Putina. Czy chcemy być "pożytecznym idiotą" w rękach obecnej rosyjskiej władzy?
Z informacji prasowej* wiemy, że MSZ otrzymało od instytucji kultury "ponad 200 zgłoszeń na kwotę ponad 65 milionów złotych". Spodziewamy się, że polskim instytucjom kultury nie będzie łatwo - nawet w sytuacji militarnego szantażu wobec Ukrainy - zrezygnować ze spodziewanych profitów. Funduszami, które leżą w puli trudno wzgardzić. Rozumiemy słabości i ludzkie i instytucjonalne. Ale w tym jednostkowym przypadku budżet jest narzędziem przemocy, pobudzania gotowości do potwierdzania zgody na łamanie umów bezpieczeństwa europejskiego. Czy nie lepiej skierować ten strumień pieniędzy do ludzi, którzy naprawdę tego potrzebują - do Ukraińców?
Chcemy także, by przedstawiciele MSZ, zgodzili się że mamy prawo łączyć "wydarzenia o charakterze kulturalno-promocyjnym z sytuacją polityczną wokół konfliktu rosyjsko-ukraińskiego".
Jednocześnie nie godzimy się na redukowanie kultury do roli narzędzia promocyjnego - kultura, to całościowy sposób przeżywania świata. To również instrument polityki.
Polityka kultury nie może ograniczyć się do szukania usprawiedliwień i alibi dla kontynuacji działań w rządzonej autorytarnie Rosji, zwłaszcza wtedy, gdy terroryzuje ona swoich sąsiadów.
OFSW
OFSW
________________________________
logo
Petersburg art collective Chto Delat has pulled out of Manifesta 10 over the ‘corporate policies’ of the organizers. Czto Dielat' / Chto Delat

________________________________
OŚWIADCZENIE OFSW w sprawie MANIFESTA '10 w Sankt Petersburgu 2014
TEKSTY i LINKI do wypowiedzi, artykułow, apeli i decyzji, o których warto wiedzieć:

Chto Djelat - prosba o zajecie stanowiska przez Manifesta
[youtube]to Kasper König : IS THE ART IN DELAY BECAUSE IF IT WAS IN TIME IT WILL BE TOO DANGEROUS ?" [/youtube]
Open letter to Kasper Koenig, Manifesta Foundation and Hermitage
Dear all,
We – artists from the Chto Delat collective (Nikolay Oleinikov, Tsaplya Olga Egorova, Dmitry Vilensky) which is pre-invited to participate in Manifesta 10 in the Hermitage - are extremely concerned with the current escalation of the political situation in Russia. We know that this concern is shared by most participants and employees of the Manifesta project.
The government of our country committed a shameful act. To be sure, they have done shameful things before, but what is happening today is so outrageous that carrying on with 'work as usual' can no longer be justified. Against the backdrop of the Russian intervention in the Crimea we need to take a position and offer a new vision of how this international cultural project can continue, given that it is made possible partly by the financial support of the Russian State. It is important to point out that just last week the streets of St Petersburg and Moscow saw decent, peaceful and legitimate forms of protest, but that all of them were brutally crushed by the state police and provocateurs violating the state’s own constitutional law. Perhaps Manifesta needn't care much about all this, except that this current repression is directed at the future local public of Manifesta in Russia – the very public that represents and defends the European values in our country and that today is humiliated, repressed, and silenced. This repression, moreover, is happening with the direct involvement of the city administration, which also happens to show enthusiastic support for the highly acclaimed and respected international event that is Manifesta.
Manifesta X cannot simply ignore this situation because it seriously compromises its mission.
You know that we have not supported the idea of boycotting Manifesta X because we believe that Manifesta could be productively involved in the development of the democratic and alternative public sphere in Russia. Therefore we are doing our best to have a strong and legitimate contribution to this project. Until now we believed that many things could still be done to challenge the repressive consensus of local life in Russia. Now, however, we can no longer keep silent; we need to mobilize all possible forces to stop the war and a total crash of Russian civil society under the guise of patriotic hysteria.
Manifesta has never been and could not be simply a nice, polite art show, nor can it be a Potemkin village designed to enhance the reputation of the Russian state (if one could talk about such a “reputation” anymore). So in this crucial moment we appeal to Manifesta and the Hermitage to raise their voices in support of the antiwar protests in Russia.
The situation is getting worse everyday. Unless we act together now, in June it will be too late.
Chto Djelat' - art collective
Chto Djelat' wobec stanowiska Manifesta rezygnuje z udzialu:
In solidarity with the Peace March in Moscow today Chto Delat announces its decision to withdraw from Manifesta 10
Chto Delat withdraws from Manifesta 10
On March 11th, Manifesta Foundation responded to recent calls for boycotts, cancelation and postponement of Manifesta 10, planned to open at the State Hermitage Museum in early summer.
In this long-awaited statement, the foundation announced that it will not cancel under the present circumstances. Also, presumably responding to calls for the exhibition’s radicalization, curator Kasper König reaffirmed his commitment to a group show demonstrating the broadest possible spectrum of art’s possibilities, emphasizing that his contract allows artistic freedom - within the limits of the Russian law - and that he will (try) to keep the show free of censorship. But at the same time, he also restated his dislike for “cheap provocations” in topical political references, warning that Manifesta 10 at Hermitage could be “misused by political actors as a platform for their own self-righteous representation,” and insisting that “it is [his] hope to present far more than just commentary on the present political circumstances.” (http://manifesta.org/2014/03/manifesta-10-will-stay-in-st-petersburg/). It is clearly art over politics. Kaspar König’s most recent statement denigrates any attempts to address the present situation in Russia by artistic means, demoting them to “self-righteous representation” and “cheap provocation” and thus effectively preemptively censoring them.
We see now from this official reaction that neither curator nor institution are capable of rising to the challenge of a dramatically evolving political situation, and we cannot be held hostage by its corporate policies, however reasonable they would sound under different circumstance.
For this reason, we, the artists of Chto delat, have decided to withdraw our participation from the exhibition at Hermitage.
As we have said before, we are generally against boycotts and especially as far as international cultural projects in Russia are concerned. A cultural blockade will only strengthen the position of reactionary forces at a time when the marginalized anti-war movement in Russia so desperately needs solidarity. But our aim at least should be to turn every cultural project into a manifestation of dissent against the Russian government’s policy of violence, repressions, and lies. Even if you are staging Shakespeare or exhibiting Matisse, the task of culture today is to find the artistic language to bring home that simple message.
Sadly, Manifesta cannot rise to this challenge. Had the situation remained as it was, with a soft authoritarianism continuing to stagnate in Russia, the project might have been a positive factor for the further development of a fledgling public sphere. But as conditions worsen and reactionary forces grow stronger by the day, Manifesta has shown that it can respond with little more than bureaucratic injunctions to respect law and order in a situation where any and all law has gone to the wind. For that reason, any participation in the Manifesta 10 exhibition loses its initial meaning.
We have sympathy for the views expressed in the personal statement by Joanna Warsza, curator of Manifesta 10’s public program, and we would only be too happy to continue supporting her efforts. Nevertheless, her statement has a private quality, and the dangers to the project - censorship, manipulations of meaning, and intimidation, which she describes so accurately, are inevitable under current political escalation.
Warsza precisely describes the choice between engagement and the desire to stay on the sidelines. Our own choice also lies with engagement, but in forms of action and artistic expression for which we can take responsibility in this new situation. As the only “living” local participants of Kaspar König’s project, our withdrawal comes with the responsibility to address the local context and make an artistic statement independently of Manifesta, aiming for resonance both in Russia and internationally.
We are now beginning work on such a new project: a solidarity exhibition of Ukrainian and Russian artists, poets, intellectuals and cultural figures. At this terrible moment in our society’s history, we are ready to demonstrate our unity and the possibility of taking action against the war together, rising above the flood of hate, lies, manipulation, and direct violence, and not above politics.
We do not know how, when, or where this project will take place, but we are sure that working toward its realization, and not self-representation at Manifesta-Hermitage exhibition, is the only responsible way to proceed.
Chto Delat - art collective